The Google Pixel 7 sequence launch is only some days away, so we’ll formally know every part there may be to find out about these telephones on October 6. However historical past tells us that no Pixel handset is actually with out subject.
So with that in thoughts, we requested Android Authority readers what Google would get fallacious with the Pixel 7 sequence (if it acquired one thing fallacious). The votes are lastly in, and listed here are the outcomes.
What is going to Google get fallacious with the Pixel 7 sequence?
Over 1,300 votes had been tallied as of writing, and it seems that the most well-liked decide was “efficiency.” 21.1% of surveyed readers suppose Google’s newest telephones may disappoint within the horsepower division. This may not be a shock in gentle of the unique Tensor lagging behind its rivals, whereas leaked Tensor G2 specs recommend no actual CPU improve both.
The fingerprint scanner got here in second place, with 18.86% of respondents saying Google will stumble when it comes the Pixel 7 line’s authentication. This isn’t a stunning alternative both, as a sluggish, inaccurate fingerprint scanner was a significant criticism final 12 months.
Rounding out the highest three was “software program polish,” accounting for 17.80% of the vote. This was a critical stumbling block on the Pixel 6 launch final 12 months, so it is sensible to see this feature additionally gaining a ton of votes.
We additionally noticed 7.65% of polled readers vote for the “different” possibility, and feedback level to potential woes like sluggish charging and better pricing. In any other case, it’s fascinating to notice that solely 3.11% of respondents felt that Google will get the cameras fallacious. This maybe speaks to Google’s long-standing energy on this subject that only a few voters thought they might mess up the digicam expertise.
- splus: The ballot doesn’t enable to pick all of the gadgets, so I’ll write it right here – they’ll get fallacious all of these issues.
- roaduardo: For me software program polish and efficiency go hand in hand. However worth is primary for me. They’ve all the time tousled on the value first, for my part.
- : It’s going to be positive. This looks as if an iterative improve so there will probably be a variety of polish 🙂